>>In your post 57 you embrace the good/bad dichotomy I decry, and you incorrectly note out that its the happy-clappy folks that don’t want people to employ those labels.<<
Oh, you mean this, where I explain that while it’s easier to use the abbreviations TLM and NO, some don’t know what you’re talking about?
“And that is simply your opinion. It is much easier to write TLM and NO, but some do not know what you are talking about. Vatican II ushered in the hippies and libs to our Holy Masses. Mother Angelica helped people to see why we were uncomfortable there and start the long process back to a historic NO. To use VII and Pre-VII defines the innovation or non-innovation in the Holy Mass. Only the “Happy Catholics” prefer we not speak in this way.”
>>In fact, its the lefevbrites and the happy-clappys that typiclally use these labels perjoratively!<<
And EWTN. Which group are they in?
EWTN commendably does not use the preV2=good/postV2=bad dichotomy.
Why do you ask?
You have a legitimate beef with the faux “spirit of Vatican 2”.
You seem to have sadly allowed that to metasticize into a “V2=bad” cancer that you spread wherever you go.