Here we are, about 3 months before the official launch of the corrected translation of the Mass, with plenty of diocese seeing the old regime of faux and elitist “liturgists” being retired and losing influence, and you are claiming that nothing has worked and therefore an in-your-face attitude is appropriate.
I suppose you have been dealing with entrenched libtards at your parish (in your chancery), so you are not as inclined to see all the progress? Is that it? I certainly understand that it is bad in some areas - I left a very bad parish situation in 2000 and have never looked back. I suppose I would not see the basis for hope if I was still there. But it is hard to deny progress has been made if you follow the official acts of B16. Regardless of how much your local priest seems to ignore them, the Church’s rubrics will prevail and you local priest will be dead some day.
>>Here we are, about 3 months before the official launch of the corrected translation of the Mass, with plenty of diocese seeing the old regime of faux and elitist “liturgists” being retired and losing influence, and you are claiming that nothing has worked and therefore an in-your-face attitude is appropriate.<<
Nope, I said talk with your feet and checkbook. I did. Not a libtard at my parish.
http://www.saintcyrils.org/
But I’ll tell you this, if you think that innovation is not a problem in the Holy Mass in the US, you are desensitized to it. I travel and go to many masses. Mother Angelica was right. It’s “Electric Church”. You get a shock every time you walk in.
And when the new Missal is implemented, what happens when a parish ignores it? When they keep their handholding and inclusive language? Wait and see. You’ll be waiting a LONG time to see anything done about it.