Posted on 06/03/2011 7:41:18 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
Except for the 10% number (I think it's more like 1.5%), I'm in complete agreement with you on this. I'm no fan of public, i.e. government-funded-and-run school systems, and what you point out is one of many reasons why. Moving children out of public schools and into charter schools, private schools, and home schools is the best solution IMO.
I read sometime last year where a representative of the Education Dept stated 10%. I have no idea where I read it and couldn’t find it a few weeks ago though didn’t try very hard...it has to be out there somewhere - don’t have time to look but will try later.
You mentioned John Jay...:)
Opinion: John Jay report holds lessons for Baptists
http://www.abpnews.com/content/view/6438/9/
“Those other guys are just as bad (or worse) is a defence?
I only deal in that to which I can attach names/dates etc., not anonymous surveys.
What others have done or not is irrelevant to my comment.
Whether you discuss or not is up to you.
A couple of observations:
If you missed this recent post of mine, I find the John Jay Report suspect in at least one area. I think we can all agree that the church had bishops trying to stop the crisis, and others trying to perpetuate it. We know that some bishops (Weakland in America and Vangheluwe in Belgium) not only moved perpetrators around knowingly, but were perpetrators themselves. Yet the John Jay report assigns five categories to sum up bishop responses, yet inexplicably, no category was created for "perpetrators".
And re the ABP article, I think it's a gross error for the author to say that "Southern Baptists have refused to implement any denominational record-keeping on credibly-accused Baptist clergy". There's a key misunderstanding around the issue of ecclesiology: the SBC is run bottom-up, not top-down. The Catholic Church could create such a list, because it's ruled largely from the top down (at least at the Archdiocese level) The SBC simply isn't a central, standing organization that can do so, w/o prior authority from it's independent member congregations. That's why they are called the Southern Baptist Convention, and not the Southern Baptist Denomination. In order to implement record-keeping, the SBC would have to change their organizational model into something more centrally-governed and top-down imposed, which runs against their core beliefs regarding the authority of the local congregation.
Also, the author of this piece, Christa Brown, is a doctorate student at the Iliff School of Theology. Iliff is a United Methodist school, hardly a bastion of political or religious conservatism.
I answered most of your questions on this thread (taken from post #18 - we can continue the discussion there if you want...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2720579/posts?q=1&;page=51
“Also, the author of this piece, Christa Brown, is a doctorate student at the Iliff School of Theology. Iliff is a United Methodist school, hardly a bastion of political or religious conservatism.”
Agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.