Obviously you don’t want to examine the evidence about this or you would have spent more time thinking over what was posted.
It’s your prerogative , but one would think you woud want to be able to defend your non historical position by showing some history to prove something wrong.
Nothing surprise me around this forum though.
I wish you well in your search or truth
At this point, the conversation has become tedious. I find no reason to examine any evidence when a main doctrine of Catholics lacks any teaching in the NT.
Nowhere is it taught that Mary was always a virgin yet Catholics defend it as if it were the most important aspect of the gospel. Truly it isn’t even an aspect of the gospel. The gospel is about Christ and not about Mary. If you want to eleveate her above her positon go ahead but I won’t do it. She was a blessed among women. She was still a woman that made mistakes and sinned and had sex with her husband. Jesus is my Savior not Mary and I am not the one that needs her to remain a virgin so I can elevate her.