You would have to cite examples. I don't think, for the most part, theology makes for persuasive apologetics because it generally begs the question.
I can give one. In that pathetic little essay Russell chastises Jesus for cursing the fig tree. He sees it as gratuitously cruel.
The cursing of the fig tree cannot be understood outside of a thoroughly theological context. But Russell didn’t bother to look beneath the surface of his simplistic, facile reading. He read the Gospel account on HIS terms, rather than on its own terms, and with knowing something of the theological context which is necessary to understand why Jesus cursed the fig tree.