You have condemned those who have criticized White and then immediately turned around and criticized others.
When asked to explain the inconsistency, you stated that White should somehow be exempt because she is a public figure - which, let's be serious, is an absolutely ridiculous argument.
Then you said that you were exempt from your own rule because God Himself had instructed you to criticize others.
These are the facts. I understand your words perfectly.
I also understand that your spiritual pride is such that you would rather implicate the Almighty Himself in your wrongdoing that admit to your wrongdoing.
Interestingly, this is precisely the moral pathology that White exhibits: her words are not only dishonest and uncandid but defiant.
Unlike you who blames the Lord for his sins, she plays it safe and blames the Devil - but the same attitude of avoiding the blame one has richly earned for one's own repeated transgressions is there.
White's mocking of her own flock's legitimate requests for pastoral care tells us exactly the kind of person she is: Simon Magus.
I'll leave you with this thought: it is one thing to repeatedly sin while admitting that one is weak and has sinned and done wrong. It is another to repeatedly sin while insisting that one is strong and one's sins are really righteous acts blessed by God.
When asked to explain the inconsistency, you stated that White should somehow be exempt because she is a public figure - which, let’s be serious, is an absolutely ridiculous argument.
What a slightly interesting super mangling of my words.
What a straw dog.
So typical of RC’s so used to the Vatican Cult’s mangling of Scripture, history and daffynitions.