Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Read the Bible as a Catholic [How? Don't take indv. verses as "literally true", says Pope]
National Catholic Register ^ | 05/05/2011 | Cindy Wooden

Posted on 05/05/2011 9:38:04 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-322 next last
To: SoothingDave

Ooops. Sorry Coach - takin’ my laps now...


41 posted on 05/05/2011 10:53:15 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; starlifter
That’s not ad hominem

Sure it is. "Sperm donor" isn't the term I use for my Dad, and "armadillo" isn't what I use for my late mom.

And you and starlifter know that. You do. No decent person does. So don't try and argue differently.

So what was Jesus saying?

You see, this is a classic example of how Catholics don't read scripture. They don't study it. They don't meditate on it. They don't crave it. In the end, it doesn't matter what scripture says anyway, because the Pope's recent statement just robbed it all of its power anyway.

And you just proved it. In starlifter's response, he used the term "Holy Father" to defend the Pope's actions. That in itself is ironic, given the topic of this thread. So let's examine the verse I cited in context (if real estate is 'location location location'....scripture is 'context context context').

Matthew 23:8-12: “But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all students. And call no one your father on earth, for you have one Father, the one in Heaven. Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Messiah. The great among you will be your servant. All who exalt themselves will be humbled, and all who humble themselves will be exalted.”

Christ was condemning Pharisees who had elevated themselves above God as the ultimate authorities. They didn't have the humility to recognize God as the source of all authority, , law, teaching, and fatherhood.

They had set themselves up as "spiritual fathers." Remind you of anyone?

It is obvious that Christ condemned that. He condemned their pride, fame, and rank.

Matthew 23: 5-7 "Everything they do is done for people to see: They make their phylacteries wide and the tassels on their garments long; they love the place of honor at banquets and the most important seats in the synagogues; they love to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces and to be called ‘Rabbi’ by others."

This is why God's word is ALIVE! He tells us to study it. To meditate on it "day and night" for a reason.

Anyone who calls themselves a child of God, and hand waves away His Word is not a true disciple of Christ.

42 posted on 05/05/2011 10:54:02 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All

Apparently, context is too advanced of a concept for some Protestants.


43 posted on 05/05/2011 10:54:34 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Murdering unborn children is the highest sacrament in the liberal religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

Well why don’t you get back to us when you can do better than “kinda” definitions....


44 posted on 05/05/2011 10:56:03 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
yeah, I shoulda thought twice about that.

Once would be nice too...

45 posted on 05/05/2011 10:57:55 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Are you arguing that you can’t just rip Biblical quotes out of context, that you need to understand them within the context of the lesson or message being given in any particular passage, chapter, or book?

Cause that’s the Catholic argument.


46 posted on 05/05/2011 10:58:18 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Yes, some Protestants apparently believe that EVERY SINGLE WORD of the Bible is to be taken literally as the unadulterated word of God...........

Other than those sections they didn’t include in the Bible.

Apparently the sections they left out were less literal or less directly dictated/inspired by God.


47 posted on 05/05/2011 10:58:45 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Nonsense. You’re busted, but lack the intellectual integrity to admit it.

Using euphemisms in place of a term you profess to have trouble with is not an attack no matter how much you gripe.


48 posted on 05/05/2011 11:03:27 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Christ was condemning Pharisees who had elevated themselves above God as the ultimate authorities. They didn't have the humility to recognize God as the source of all authority, , law, teaching, and fatherhood.

They had set themselves up as "spiritual fathers." Remind you of anyone?

It is obvious that Christ condemned that. He condemned their pride, fame, and rank.

1 Cor 4:15For though ye have ten thousand instructers in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel.

16Wherefore I beseech you, be ye followers of me.

Paul here calls himself the father of the Cornithians.

Did he elevated himself above God as the ultimate authority?

Did he not have the humility to recognize God as the source of all authority, , law, teaching, and fatherhood?

49 posted on 05/05/2011 11:05:07 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“They had set themselves up as “spiritual
fathers.” Remind you of anyone?”

Yeah, the apostle Paul.


50 posted on 05/05/2011 11:06:55 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
They had set themselves up as "spiritual fathers." Remind you of anyone?

Spiritual fathers? Yes, it reminds me of a certain Paul of Tarsus. Perhaps you are familiar with these little excerpts.

I write not these things to confound you; but I admonish you as my dearest children. For if you have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet not many fathers. For in Christ Jesus, by the gospel, I have begotten you. [1 Corinthians 4.14-15]

Our mouth is open to you, O ye Corinthians, our heart is enlarged. You are not straitened in us, but in your own bowels you are straitened. But having the same recompense, (I speak as to my children,) be you also enlarged. [2 Corinthians 6.11-13]

But be zealous for that which is good in a good thing always: and not only when I am present with you. My little children, of whom I am in labour again, until Christ be formed in you. [Galatians 4.18-19]

Pretty obvious to even the most cursory reading that Saint Paul was the spiritual father of Christians and described himself as such.

51 posted on 05/05/2011 11:07:43 AM PDT by cothrige
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

What? We can’t take individual verses out of context? How will Protestantism survive? Oh, wait...


52 posted on 05/05/2011 11:13:40 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
The true Church is always ready to welcome back those who fall away.
53 posted on 05/05/2011 11:17:00 AM PDT by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

Wow! Integrity!

Reminds me of the early days of FR...

;o)


54 posted on 05/05/2011 11:23:25 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Uh oh. Guess they'll have to stop quoting from John Chapter 6 now.

And from Matthew 16:18.

55 posted on 05/05/2011 11:43:40 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed: he's hated on seven continents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

So the Bible is more like “guidelines?”


56 posted on 05/05/2011 11:51:55 AM PDT by Grunthor (http://www.hermancain.com/index.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
The rest of the story from the article:

“An interpretation of the sacred writings that disregards or forgets their inspiration does not take into account their most important and precious characteristic: that they come from God,” he said.

The Catholic position is that the Holy Spirit inspired the biblical writers so that “human words express the word of God,” he said.

“Through his word, God wants to communicate to us the whole truth about himself and his plan of salvation for humanity,” the Pope wrote. “A commitment to discovering ever more the truth of the sacred books, therefore, is a commitment to seeking to better know God and the mystery of his saving will.”
57 posted on 05/05/2011 11:57:07 AM PDT by Carpe Cerevisi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Alas, for you. Op-eds, such as this, are often published by the rag we Catholics refer to as the National Catholic Fishwrap, as if they were actually news. It is a left-leaning paper, and quite often heretical. As you are not Catholic, you can, I guess, be forgiven for having fallen for their shtick. Sorry to disappoint you, Alex. This article is, without question, incorrect and inaccurate. John 6, and Matthew, as well as the rest of the Word of God, still applies. And this old chestnut:
"But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth."
58 posted on 05/05/2011 12:01:51 PM PDT by sayuncledave (A cruce salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: conservonator
"... their inability to differentiate fact from truth ..."

Right here in the Religion Forum we regularly see Protestants interpreting Scripture based on the definition of words as they are now used rather than based on the meaning of the word at the time it was written or translated. Those same folks, then, will scream and jump up and down over how right their interpretation is when they're actually defending not the Word, but instead, a particular popular god of the individual interpreter.

Anyone who doubts it need only have those regularly defaming Mary explain why we should ignore what Samuel wrote. There is, in reality, no Protestant understanding of His Word. There is only a Protestant understanding of select, often redefined, sentences.

Once He blesses you with the Spirit and guides your study of Scripture, (He freely guides those who earnestly seek to have their minds opened to Christ rather than to a preconception), you clearly see both why Peter was given a new name why Mary has a place in Christian lives. Anyone fighting those two points on grounds other than their personal inability to accept them hasn't actually studied the Scriptures. They've studied and accepted someone elses interpretation of Scripture, complete with preconceptions and deliberately introduced errors. The real shame is that so many people spend so much time reinforcing the errors they've been taught rather than praying to Him for guidance and really seeing that the Word became flesh, while in the flesh started His Church, and to this day comes to us in the flesh if we will accept Him.

Semper Fi (bet you a nickel Michael has Marines filling sandbags at some point rather than just easy guard duty)

59 posted on 05/05/2011 12:09:58 PM PDT by Rashputin (Barry is insane., so handlers keep him medicated and on the golf course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sayuncledave
Alas, for you. Op-eds, such as this, are often published by the rag we Catholics refer to as the National Catholic Fishwrap, as if they were actually news. It is a left-leaning paper, and quite often heretical....This article is, without question, incorrect and inaccurate.

Check your targets. This piece appeared in the EWTN-owned National Catholic Register, not the National Catholic Reporter aka "Fishwrap".

Thank you for taking part in my blind taste test and confirming that the Pope's words sound left-leaning and heretical to you, too.

60 posted on 05/05/2011 12:15:24 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed: he's hated on seven continents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson