Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RnMomof7

“The Apocrypha itself never claims to be the Word of God.”

What a ridiculous criteria!

How many books of the Bible would be excluded if THAT were the standard?

And what of the fraudulent N.T. editing by Luther?
Protestants certainly have no “unanimous support” for much, considering the 13,000 denominations. Private, yet, conflicting revelation is NOT very convincing.

“The early church showed no unanimous support...”
“Unanimous support” is NOT the criteria!
The Synod of Hippo (393) and the three of Carthage (393, 397, and 419), are quite sufficient!


105 posted on 05/07/2011 10:27:23 AM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry
“Unanimous support” is NOT the criteria!"

What these Protestants do not grasp is that the Church is the context of the Bible whereas the Bible is the context of the Protestant churches because the Church gave us the bible. Without the authority of the Church and it's canon the Bible in an errant collection of inerrant works.

107 posted on 05/07/2011 10:53:28 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry
And what of the fraudulent N.T. editing by Luther? Protestants certainly have no “unanimous support” for much, considering the 13,000 denominations. Private, yet, conflicting revelation is NOT very convincing.

Catholic myth.. Luther never removed anything from the bible.. whereas Rome added to it ignoring the warning of God

114 posted on 05/07/2011 11:57:18 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson