Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Campion
Of course He's God, but with the same license one can assume Mary is the mother of God, one may assume she never considered herself as such, nor was it ever implied TO her that that is what she is/was.

Men bestowed that title upon her ... the same caliber of men that dubbed her the Queen of Heaven ... an obvious association to the pagan Ishtar.

81 posted on 04/12/2011 9:35:12 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: knarf
one may assume she never considered herself as such, nor was it ever implied TO her that that is what she is/was.

"one may assume"? You know this, how?

Elizabeth addressed her as "Mother of my Lord". Sounds a lot like "Mother of God" to me.

an obvious association to the pagan Ishtar

Really? So when pagans apply a title to one of their "gods," any subsequent use of that title by Christians is somehow "pagan" ... by "obvious association"?

The Greeks called Zeus "heavenly father". Guess calling God "heavenly father" is "an obvious association to the pagan Zeus," by the same logic you're applying.

85 posted on 04/12/2011 9:40:33 AM PDT by Campion ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies when they become fashions." -- GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: knarf
Men bestowed that title upon her ... the same caliber of men that dubbed her the Queen of Heaven ... an obvious association to the pagan Ishtar.

Which is about as logical as associating it to this "Ishtar".


90 posted on 04/12/2011 9:45:25 AM PDT by Carpe Cerevisi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson