I read the EWTN rational for pulling Voris' program, and that's not at all consistent with the rationale here. I do think the Catholic church is speaking with multiple voices ~ even though EWTN's rationale is consistent with an actual RC "official church" action regarding Voris.
So, which is it guys ~ "he's bad, he's bad, you'd better believe he's bad," or, based on a claim of him messing around with up to 8 women (in a Biblical sense ~ see King James version) he was simply SUSPENDED TEMPORARILY from speaking for the RC church.
You may be confusing Michael Voris with Fr. Corapi. As far as I know, Voris was accused of messing around with up to 8 women. And Fr. Corapi doesn't pretend to have a full head of hair :)
Could be ~ now, prove that they’re different guys ~ (aside, thanks ~ different name ~ but the principle is the same ~ sometimes a higher Catholic official or official body will decide someone is temporarily suspended from speaking for the church and subordinate bodies and affiliates are supposed to conform).
"Voris WASN'T accused of messing around with up to 8 women."I don't think you could find eight women who are attracted to a guy with thinks a dead weasal can be passed off as a hairpiece, even on the Religion Forum.
WHAT?!?
Where, when and how was Voris accused of this?