Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CTrent1564
Neither of those is consistent with historic orthodox Apostolic Tradition as expressed via the early Church Fathers and great Councils of the early Church

I notice that whenever Fundamentalist Protestants believe something the Church fathers believed about the "old testament," the first eleven chapters of Genesis, or the Creation, the belief of the fathers is dismissed as "they were men of their time." But when the Church fathers believed something that Fundamentalist Protestants simply cannot stretch their minds around or believe in good conscience that Catholic apologists suddenly treat those opinions as infallible and non-negotiable.

Hence real presence is "absolutely essential," and six day young earth creationism is almost banned.

92 posted on 04/06/2011 12:56:32 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Hachodesh hazeh lakhem ro'sh chodashim; ri'shon hu' lakhem lechodshey hashanah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Zionist Conspirator

zionist Conspirator:

I think you are mistating your case. One can believe in literal 6 day of creation or one can choose not too, as Caatholic as that ultimately is a scientific question not a theological one. The theological issue Whether the Eucharist is truly the sacrament of Christ’s body of Blood and thus partaking of the Eucharist is nothing short of communion with God, that is a theological position that the Fathers were consistent on.


94 posted on 04/06/2011 1:26:13 PM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson