Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ModelBreaker
When we’re looking back 2000 years, a 3-5 year difference in dating something doesn’t make much of a difference.

That may very well be true. I wasn't commenting on that. I was commenting only the use of the term "undisputedly dated" when talking about books of the New Testament.

56 posted on 03/30/2011 10:21:06 AM PDT by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: trad_anglican

“That may very well be true. I wasn’t commenting on that. I was commenting only the use of the term “undisputedly dated” when talking about books of the New Testament.”

I don’t think there’s much dispute over the dating of the epistles. If you know of serious questions of the dating, I’d love to know about them because I kind of follow that stuff in an amateur sort of way. Of course, there’s the standard Nero vs Dometian dispute about the dating of Revelation. But that really doesn’t affect the dating of Paul’s works.


57 posted on 03/30/2011 10:45:33 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson