Dr. Bart Ehrman
Posted on 03/28/2011 12:48:31 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
A new book by a major New Testament scholar is sure to make mincemeat of many people’s faith. Needlessly.
The scholar is the iconoclastic Dr. Bart Ehrman, who teaches religion at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
The book is called Forged: Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are. Ehrman said on a radio broadcast that about 75 percent of the New Testament documents are supposedly forged. They’re frauds.
Dr. Sam Lamerson is a conservative New Testament scholar who teaches at Knox Seminary in Ft. Lauderdale. (By way of full disclosure, I earned a theology degree there). He heard Ehrman on a radio broadcast say words to this effect: “I want to be the scholar that uses the F-word about the Bible. I want people to know that these books were forged.”
“Forged” is a strong word. Several of the New Testament books claim no authorship at all. Church tradition has attributed them to various writers, but the biblical text itself does not claim authorship for these particular books. For instance, none of the four Gospels (of which tradition names the writers as Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) actually have the names of the authors at the beginning of their documents.
But if a document is anonymous, how could it be a forgery?
Dr. Mike Licona, a rising star in New Testament scholarship, has been reading an advanced copy of Forged. He told me that the most prolific biographer of antiquity is widely held to be Plutarch (as in Plutarch’s Lives), yet of all the 50 or so existing manuscripts we have of Plutarch, none of them are signed.
Were they forgeries? By Ehrman’s definition, it would seem so. But no serious scholar holds that view.
Dr. Licona, who has debated Ehrman twice, told me, “What we’re seeing from Ehrman [in Forged] is not new information. It may be new to many readers who aren’t used to looking at the academic stuff, but it’s not at all new.”
Ehrman goes on to assert that many New Testament books that do claim authorship within the text, such as Ephesians, Colossians, and the letters of Peter and James, are not written by the claimed authors. It should be noted that this is not based on manuscript evidence. It’s based largely on the style of the text, and there are many conservative scholars who are not convinced by these arguments. Thus, Ehrman is stating liberal opinion as fact.
Ironically, Ehrman even states in his own book, “Virtually all of the problems with what I’ve been calling forgeries can be solved if secretaries were heavily involved in the compositions of the early Christian writings.” [p. 134]
But that’s exactly what happened.
Conservative scholars note that many of Paul’s writings begin with his name…and that of a co-author, such as Timothy, Silas, or Sosthenes.
Dr. Lamerson, who interestingly worked his way through seminary by doing magic tricks, knows sleight of hand when he sees it (or in this case, hears it). He said, “Of course, being forged is very different from having a secretary or having someone help you with the text or not knowing who wrote the text because their name simply isn’t included.”
Ehrman likes to tout that he’s a former evangelical, who went to Moody Bible Institute and Wheaton College. Ehrman then went on to Princeton Seminary where he began to have some doubts about his faith. That faith finally shattered when he was teaching at Rutgers University. Now, he’s an agnostic.
So why are Bart Ehrman and other liberal scholars even concerning themselves with this stuff if they don’t believe it?
Amazingly, Jesus made a warning that fits here (if the Gospel of Matthew is to be believed-and, no, it wasn’t forged; it just isn’t signed). He admonished those who “shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces.” He said, “You yourselves won’t go in, but you prevent others from going in.”
I’m concerned that many people will hear Bart Ehrman and think that he speaks for all the scholars. He does not.
Many people might miss the Gospel because they take Ehrman’s word as Gospel. It is not.
It is liberal opinion repackaged well for a mass audience.
For anyone needing a scholarly rebuttal to Bart Ehrman’s 2011 book, feel free to read Terry L. Wilder's excellent article called "Pseudonymity and the New Testament," which appears in a 2001 book, Interpreting the New Testament: Essays on Methods and Issues. (Indeed, his arguments aren’t new.)
Dr. Paul Maier, a professor of ancient history at Western Michigan University and a first rate scholar of the New Testament and its history, told me, “Both [Ehrman] and his publisher [HarperOne] are guilty of cheap sensationalism with little or no regard for the truth.”
Ehrman’s book went on sale on March 22, 2011. Just in time for Easter, he, his publisher, and the lackeys in the media who go for all the anti-faith iconoclasm get another chance to try and cash in. What a friend we have in Jesus.
-- Jerry Newcombe is the senior producer and host of The Coral Ridge Hour. He has also written or co-written 21 books, including The Book That Made America: How the Bible Formed Our Nation
Not those of true faith.
Controversy sells books.
I don’t think that I’d call Bart Ehrman a scholar.
Yet another attack on Christianity from the Ivory Tower of Babel
Voltaire tried this, now they print Bibles from the very house he wrote from.
Satan’s been on full court press for some time now. He knows where he’s going and he wants to try to drag as many of us as he can down with him.
I’m also sorry but I have to question how deep and genuine this guys’ faith was. I will never give up my faith, it’s the only thing that keeps me going. It’s the only way to make sense out of why things are the way they are in this fallen world and not go insane and start calling good evil, and evil, good. I know things aren’t supposed to be the way they are and God will return and finally tell us all, “Enough” and come to make things right.
Bottom line, it just sounds like someone who didn’t have real faith, lost it due to what he was taught in college. This one just wrote a book about it and hopes he can convince others of weak faith, to follow him.
Bart Ehrman?
LOL!
This is meta-tripe.
Ok, I’m declaring that I’m an expert at colleges and Princeton is a fraud.
Oh my, no more atheists will go to Princeton based on what I say.
If he is agnostic, he should be removed from teaching in a seminary, plain and simple.
The same principle applies as to why we don’t allow anti-American foreigners to hold the office of Presdident . . . at least once upon a time.
Seems pretty weak if by “forged” he merely means that there is no overt authorship. Particularly if he’s looking only at the writing hand of whoever penned it. It seems pretty likely that Paul, for example, would have co-written a letter with Timothy, with Timothy doing most if not all of the actual scribing. The two of them discussing what ought to be said and what topics need to be addressed.
I don’t see how this challenges the content, purpose, or even inspiration of the books.
Critical scholars have been doing this for over a century.
It’s a game of topping what the last critical scholar has said in criticism of scripture.
These guys start their study ventures with a pantload of presuppositions and self-fulfilling parameters and then miraculously verify them in their conclusions.
Dr. Bart Ehrman
Faith in Jesus is separate from faith in “The Word”.I know many who worship the “bible” like a false God. They have trouble with contradictions and errors. These are secretarial reflections and are valuable to tell us what happened but not to be worshiped in my view.
ping for later reading....
Mincemeat, indeed.
How did I know this would be Bart Ehrman?
In 2006 and 2009 he appeared on The Colbert Report, as well as The Daily Show, to promote his books Misquoting Jesus, and Jesus, Interrupted
He has also made several guest appearances on National Public Radio (NPR) including the show Fresh Air in February 2008 to discuss his book God’s Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question-Why We Suffer
Daniel B. Wallace, Executive Director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts
wrote, “One almost gets the impression that he is encouraging the Chicken Littles in the Christian community to panic at data that they are simply not prepared to wrestle with”
If, as many here assert, the Bible is the “word of God”, then the Almighty God is the author and not some Palestinian peasants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.