Posted on 03/26/2011 12:59:03 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg
You were posting the photobucket pixs.
This so called "photobucket incident" was mainly between Titanites and Quix. I had no involvement in it, and I did not post any photobucket pixs. Here is the link to the argument:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2680611/posts?q=1&;page=2751
The argument spans multiple pages of posts, and it cannot be reduced to a single post. Anyone can go to the link, read a few pages, and see that I was not involved in the "photobucket incident" and that I did not post any photbucket pixs.
Will you please apologize for repeatedly making the false claim that I never did anything to show I was quoting anyone, for repeatedly quoting me out of context to make it look like I never used quotation marks, for having the nerve to tell me to apologize, for falsely accusing me of having some "photobucket incident', and for falsely accusing me of posting "photobucket pixs?"
lol. Why not make it 250%, Cronos? That would be just as accurate as your statistic. When it comes to the Orthodox Presbyterian church, Cronos' "statistics" have proven unreliable. If you check his homepage, esquirette, you'll find dozens of errors.
The OPC is a very conservative denomination. I doubt the majority voted for Obama. In fact, I don't know any OPC member who is a democrat. They, unlike the RCC, actually do decry immorality, abortion, socialism and homosexuality, individually and as church teaching.
And if you knew anything about the history of the OPC you'd know that members of that church were part of Reagan's kitchen cabinet, and instrumental in getting Reagan elected. Twice.
Cronos litters the forum with errors about the OPC, but you won't hear anyone whining about "anti-OPC bigotry." It's just chalked up to the fact that when there is no defense for the ignorance and destruction within the RCC, it's a lot easier to lash out at other churches, regardless of the truth.
You won't find anyone in the OPC or PCA or any other Protestant denomination praying to a human being; not to Calvin or Machen or Luther or Falwell or Spurgeon or any other Godly man who preaches the Gospel in truth. Those men preached the Good News of Christ risen; they did not forgive sins or "co-redeem" or "further justify" or answer prayers or mediate between God and men or any of the hundreds of acts of grace only God performs which Rome attributes to fallen sinners like Mary and popes and dead saints and various pederast "alter Christus."
The RCC has a real problem on its hands. Thousands of its children have been raped by pederast priests who were protected and promoted by the RCC hierarchy. That's a pretty uncomfortable reality to face. Apparently some choose to deny that fact and make up stories about other churches rather than to clean its own house.
Such willful denial of the corruption at the heart of the RCC only leads to more children being destroyed, more faith being abandoned and more of society being deconstructed into the socialism we see today where 54% of Roman Catholics actually DID vote for Obama, therefore handing him the election.
What a sad and dangerous blindness. May God help Rome's children, even if Rome won't.
Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them. Her princes in the midst thereof are like wolves ravening the prey, to shed blood, and to destroy souls, to get dishonest gain." -- Ezekiel 22:25-27 "There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey; they have devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and precious things; they have made her many widows in the midst thereof.
The RCC has a real problem on its hands. Thousands of its children have been raped by pederast priests who were protected and promoted by the RCC hierarchy.
And that is the issue, isn't it? Yet, there are plenty of attempts to deflect the thread away from this major issue.
Way to go, Doc! Excellent post.
And... it WILL leave a mark. ;)
Hoss
So glad you clarified the baseless nature of the statistic provided. Thanks.
INDEED.
MUCH AGREE.
As a general rule, often such parades . . . and there are several who propagate them in the RC camp . . . Peacocks strutting with frazzled feathers can be occasionally interesting after a fashion . . . kind of as models of what to avoid becoming.
Already explained in posts 1119, 1126, 1130, and 1177. I'm not explaining again when I already gave four perfectly fine explanations, particularly in posts 1130 and 1177.
I would like to personally guarantee that no one in my reformed Presbyterian church voted for Obama!
Some voted for third party candidates, but none for Obama!!
What an allegation!
Source for this statistic?
Hoss
lol. That doesn't matter when the intention is to mow down everything within range of the RCC which might have occasion to criticize her.
Thanks again for posting facts.
Some voted for third party candidates, but none for Obama!!
What an allegation!
Wow. How many churches can say that?
How fortunate you are to fellowship with such a congregation.
“Wow. How many churches can say that?”
Having been in a reformed Presbyterian culture for many decades I’d honestly assume that most if not all similar congregations across the U.S. could say the same thing.
Amen. That's my experience, too.
To:presently no screen name; Cronos; metmom; HossB86
What does cronos have to do with this?
Your scattergun use of quotation marks is incorrect and thus confusing, making it unclear who said what.
It’s helpful to learn html. It’s actually pretty simple and helps to prevent the kind of grammatical mistakes found in your posts.
Try this link for learning how to avoid these kinds of errors in the future...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1285967/posts
I'm sick of dealing with you. Are you ever going to own up to your mistakes?
Perhaps I thought he would be interested. Don't lecture me about pinging people unnecessarily if you haven't said anything to metmom about posts like 944 and 1094. Not that there's anything wrong with metmom doing that, except that she pinged so many people to false statements about me and refuses to make amends.
People ping others unnecessarily all the time to posts. The fact that you are bringing this up is a sign of desperation to avoid the fact that you have said false things about me.
No, it's not.
and thus confusing, making it unclear who said what.
Maybe to those of a lower intellect who don't know how to refer to a previous post if they ever get confused. I guess I did forget who my audience is.
Try this link for learning how to avoid these kinds of errors in the future...
Thank you, but I am finding this site linked from free republic to be handy, myself:
http://www.davesite.com/webstation/html/
Is that what you're saying? Because every source cited gives those percentages...
Protestant 51.3%, Roman Catholic 23.9%, Mormon 1.7%, other Christian 1.6%, Jewish 1.7%, Buddhist 0.7%, Muslim 0.6%, other or unspecified 2.5%, unaffiliated 12.1%, none 4% (2007 est.)
Good. Whatever site helps you not to repeat the grammatical errors found in your other posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.