"Jesus was the bridegroom at the marriage of Cana of Galilee...We say it was Jesus Christ who was married, to be brought into relation whereby he could see his seed [children] before he was crucified (Orson Hyde, Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p. 82)."There was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and on a careful reading of that transaction, it will be discovered that non less a person that Jesus Christ was married on that occasion. If he was never married, his intimacy with Mary and Martha an the other Mary also whom Jesus loved, must have been highly unbecoming and improper to say the best of it." (Orson Hyde, Journal of Discourses, vol. 4, p. 259).
"In the Church councils, it was spoken of: "Joseph F. Smith_ He spoke upon the marriage in Cana of Galilee. He thought Jesus was the bridegroom and Mary and Martha the brides."(Journal of Wilford Woodruff, July 22, 1883).
[Since you such a truster of blasphemies, you'll love the next one, PD] "The grand reason of the burst of public sentiment in anathemas upon Christ and his disciples, causing his crucifixion, was evidently based upon polygamy, according to the testimony of the philosophers who rose in that age. A belief in doctrine of a plurality of wives caused the persecution of Jesus and his followers. We might almost think they were Mormons (Jedediah Grant, Journal of Discourses, vol. 1, p. 346).
"One thing is certain, that there were several holy women that great loved Jesus, such as Mary and Martha her sister, and Mary Magdalene; and Jesus greatly loved them and associated with the much; and when he arose from the dead, instead of first showing himself to his chosen witnesses, the Apostles, He appeared first to these women, or at least to one of them--namely, Mary Magdalene. Now, it would be very natural for a husband in the resurrection to appear first to his own dear wives, and afterwards show himself to his other friends. If all the acts of Jesus were written, we no doubt should learn that these beloved women were his wives." (Orson Pratt, The Seer, p. 159).
Well, in typical post and run LDS inc style, the defender of blasphemies has posted his.her/its spam links and run away, with the closing assertion that claiming Mormonism is blasphemous is ‘100% false’. Well, it can’t be 100% because the above posts expose a few of the blasphemies at the heart of LDS inc dogma. So, I wonder if the pd will revise and extend his/her/its remarks? Bwahahaha
Well, in typical post and run LDS inc style, the defender of blasphemies has posted his/her/its spam links and run away, with the closing assertion that claiming Mormonism is blasphemous is ‘100% false’. Well, it can’t be 100% because the above posts expose a few of the blasphemies at the heart of LDS inc dogma. So, I wonder if the pd will revise and extend his/her/its remarks? Bwahahaha
Losing it? Bwahahaha, you lost the first time you thought you could post the drek of this anti-Christ cult and not be opposed at FR! And now for soemthing remarkable about your religious teaching, PD:
One more before bed.
Yeah you seem to be extra losing it tonight. I can practically see the froth dripping.
And you have one thing (one more thing) really backwards.
I only started posting in the religious section because of the propaganda attacks of the anti-Mormon gang here. It is your gangs attacks that are not going unanswered.
I am afraid you are too blinded to see that YOU are the cult member. You can break free though. Just as I and many others have.
I will, at the very least and as long as I am able, continue to post links to the truth and articles illustrating our true beliefs.
Have a good night! Say your prayers! I will pray for you.
Well, according to some prominent mormon apostles, both the mormon god and mormon jesus are polygamists and they supposedly have “proved” it.
Although none have ever seen that “proof”. I suspect that the “proof” of the following assertion is more along the lines of 80 proof that you and UB are talking about. Or there was some serious peyote action going on.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2690141/posts?page=38#38