Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: WPaCon; Quix
No one "cried about a vanity."

That thread clearly and quite blatantly broke the caucus rules. With the caucus designation, we're not supposed to mention another faith in the thread because members of that faith can't respond.

The thread you're referring to was so egregiously against the rules that it mentioned Protestants in the title!

As far as chutzpah goes, that one took the cake.

69 posted on 03/07/2011 11:58:29 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg

Was that it? Okay, I’ll re-post it without the caucus. I’d be happy to see your spin on it.


88 posted on 03/08/2011 4:30:31 AM PST by Celtic Cross (Does your stream of thought have fish in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

In terms of the RC’s hereon,

Even “Olyimpic Class Chutzpah”

is a grossly inadequate and anemic term to use.


116 posted on 03/08/2011 7:25:21 AM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson