Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: smvoice
Paul leaves no one in doubt as to what he is saying. There is no interpretation to be made. He states clearly that the gospel which he preached was a direct revelation of Christ, not taught to him by man, nor received of him by man. Am I disputing that?

There is no interpretation to be made.

That in itself is an act of interpretation.

462 posted on 02/23/2011 9:29:15 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg

To take the Biblical words at face value

is an . . . interpretation?

Hmmmmmmmmmmm


465 posted on 02/23/2011 9:40:09 AM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson