Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rashputin
Well, isn’t that interesting. Protestants couldn’t leave people to talk among themselves and you acknowledge that fact.

What a great example of reading incomprehension.

The fact remains, illustrated by your posts, that you mistakenly thought closed caucuses were requested by Protestants when in fact they were demanded by Roman Catholics; many of those same Roman Catholics who now deny that same privilege to others.

they're saying that without a limit on who can join their causes

Protestants couldn’t leave people to talk among themselves

Mindless contradiction, thy name is Rome.

282 posted on 02/22/2011 7:32:38 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg
Fine, what if they were? If the caucus system exists what is wrong with a Sola caucus, and any other caucus? When did I deny or say I agreed with denying anyone any caucus they like? Are you opposed to the caucus system, is that it?

I don't care who requested them and I don't care that someone who defends others who “make a joke” has no sense of humor themselves as is obviously the case with you. I just want to know what's the problem with the Sola caucus and if it is that another caucus was denied.

284 posted on 02/22/2011 7:38:23 PM PST by Rashputin (Barry is totally insane and being kept medicated and on golf courses to hide the fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson