Here’s the deal: we have peacefully asked to have our own caucus threads. Others on FR have them and we respect them. Roman Catholics, Jewish believers, Mormons, Adventists, Pentecostals. You Roman Catholics will not tolerate it and have been disrupting our threads. The Rm has asked you to stop, and we have asked you to stop. Still you insist on not tolerating our right to Free Speech. You may be happier somewhere else. Perhaps you will, like others before you, depart FR and go somewhere else, where all day long, 24/7, you can have verbal intercourse and comraderie all day and all night long, with like souls.
I endorsed you having your caucus endorsing the erroenous man-made tradtion of sola scripture. Have at it. Can I be any clearer?
The Rm has asked you to stop
Not me.
You may be happier somewhere else.
If I might be, I'd be there.
Perhaps you will, like others before you, depart FR and go somewhere else, where all day long, 24/7, you can have verbal intercourse and comraderie all day and all night long, with like souls.
Perhaps I might, some day. But in the meantime, have your caucus and eat it, too.
“Still you insist on not tolerating our right to Free Speech.”
Melodramatic and Whiner’s Caucus Award Winner.
I see some serious revisionism being written on the chronology of the events that occurred.
Those who write the rules (Protestants) and intervene from high positions write history. I must say that light has certainly been directed...Allen West...sunshine up my butt and all lol.
So you have your history...enjoy.
Back to Lurking at your Reader Rabbit logic and commenting on the real threads on politics.
That has not been established. The most plausible claim is that you have respected them recently.
Still you insist on not tolerating our right to Free Speech.
Isn't it more a matter of Assembly than speech? We can't stop you from posting.
I think the unresolved question is the one about the alleged rejection of a "Catholic/Orthodox" caucus coeval with the acceptance of a "Protestant" Caucus