[Alex Murphy]

The main criticism that can be lodged against Mr. Ray's work is quite simple: he does not accurately portray (or possibly even understand) the Protestant position that he has abandoned, and is now intent upon attacking. This is a common problem in Roman Catholic apologetics: and the fact that many Protestants don't know their faith very well, and hence allow such misrepresentations to pass without comment or correction, only exacerbates the situation.

Ping for later

[circlecity]

You definitely want to read it. White knocks it out of the park. I’m going to have to give White a second chance. My previous encounter with him was watching him debate Bart Ehrman in a video. I thought Ehrman got the better of him despite the fact I did and do support the side White was defending. I guess anyone can have a bad day. I’ll check out his site.

[metmom]

The main criticism that can be lodged against Mr. Ray's work is quite simple: he does not accurately portray (or possibly even understand) the Protestant position that he has abandoned, and is now intent upon attacking. This is a common problem in Roman Catholic apologetics: and the fact that many Protestants don't know their faith very well, and hence allow such misrepresentations to pass without comment or correction, only exacerbates the situation.

Well, I suppose that if we *failed Catholics* can be told that we don't really understand Catholic doctrine and thus are not qualified to speak on Catholic issues, we could likewise way that this failed Baptist doesn't really understand Protestant doctrine so he is not qualified to speak on the meaning of sola Scriptura.

Great refutation and explanation of what sola Scriptura really is.