How would you know he held that viewpoint, or how could you claim he held that viewpoint, is he never mentioned it?
It is just a likely that Justin Martyr believed that it was such an obvious point that it didn’t need to be stated.
That’s not an argument, it just presumption.
What I find interesting that the first person to outspokenly argue against a premillenial position was the heretic Marcion.
And one of the first to argue for the premil view the heretical sect of the Ebionites, and Cerinthus, who was a Gnostic, that even before Marcion. That’s called guilt by association, BTW.
And your position that he didn’t hold a viewpoint is mere presumption as well. I can just as easily draw one conclusion as another.
Again, I’m not debating the merits of either position. What I take issue with is calling out believers for holding different viewpoints. I see from you tag line that you have a distinct fascination with proving the dispensational position wrong. Sir...might I suggest that your focus would be better served winning souls for Christ rather than trying to disprove that which is not fundamental? I exhort you again with 2 Timothy: “But refuse foolish and ignorant speculations, knowing that they produce quarrels”.