I miss the ‘wankers for Mitt’ banner ads.
So Romney is trying to capitalize off of what was a business decision.
Marriott’s just tired of writing-off all those porn movies that got charged to rooms by accident when someone sat on the remote control. Besides, they’ll have internet porn.
I won’t be voting for Mitt in the primaries, but if he’s the reason Marriot dropped porn, then hallelujah! God works in mysterious ways.
I don’t see the Romny connection to Marriot’s decision. How do Marriot’s actions benefit Romney? I see no reason to think that those voters who like what Marriot did are going to link te decision to Romney.
I hold no brief for Romney, largely for these sorts of liberalities and flipflops, but I can't go THAT far. I thought the state supreme court did this one??
Mittens needs help shaking a porn addiction!?! (jk)
Like so much corporate posturing, this is really a no-brainer. The Mormons on the board can take credit for acting more ‘Christian-like’ by dumping a service that has been outstripped in popularity by internet pornography. I would be willing to bet that in their main-brand chains, they will retain their $10/day (or higher) internet access fees, thereby retaining an ancillary service that can be used for BOTH business and pleasure.
The odd thing is that they aren’t doing it right away and making a big splash now; it may be that contracts exist with the provider that cannot easily be exited. The point about Mittens nomination failure causing them to recant may also be a salient one.
OC
And after the great success of RomneyCare, no fiscal credibility either.
A very well rounded HYPOCRITE !
IB4PDSPAM
*ping*