Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: jjotto

What is the Christian Bible?

Isn’t the entire Holy Bible written by Jews?

With the exception of *luke* I don’t think a Christian or a Gentile had any say of what was written in the Holy Scriptures....


47 posted on 01/24/2011 2:09:52 PM PST by TaraP (An APPEASER is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: TaraP
What is the Christian Bible?

The New Testament is the Christian Bible. Notice they even have the nerve to call it New as if it somehow REPLACED the original.

Isn’t the entire Holy Bible written by Jews?

Only the Tanach, Old Testament. 72 Jews translated the first 5 books (The Torah) of the OT.

With the exception of *luke* I don’t think a Christian or a Gentile had any say of what was written in the Holy Scriptures....

The New Testament is NOT written by those they say. For instance.

According to Bishop Papias, (Papi/av), c. 125:

"Matthew compiled the reports in a Hebrew manner of speech, but each interpreted them as he could."

Matthew wrote in Hebrew, or more likely, in Aramaic which is a Hebrew dialect that was the language of Jesus' day. He did not write the original Gospel in Greek!

It is obvious that whoever wrote a book called Matthew, the book now known to Christianity and which opens the New Testament was obviously rewritten in Greek by some later person. (most likely written by a Gentile or heavily edited by one) It was probably at that time that the now-cherished traditions of the birth and death accounts were tacked onto the sayings of Jesus! This is also probably when they tried to de-judaize Jesus. jmo

This is what Papias says about Mark:
"And the presbyter would say this: Mark, who was indeed Peter's interpreter, accurately wrote as much as he remembered, yet not in order, about that which was either said or did by the Lord. For he neither heard the Lord nor followed him, but later, as I said, Peter, who as necessary would make his teachings but not exactly an arrangement of the Lord's reports, so that Mark did not fail by writing certain things as he recalled. For he had one purpose, not to omit what he heard or falsify them."

Begs the question. Just who is this Mark? And since this Mark, is an interpreter for Peter, that means that the Gospel of Mark (deceptively named), isn't even giving a first hand account. Also notice he wrote down the sayings and deeds of Jesus, which exclude the birth and death accounts as we now have them. Now if the "sayings or deeds" of Jesus were all that Mark wrote down, and if, as so many authorities now assert, the Gospels of Matthew and Luke are based on Mark, from where did the genealogies and the birth and death narratives in the Gospels come from? Even with these questions, keep in mind that this particular "Mark" wasn't personally present at the events and sayings he reports.

59 posted on 01/24/2011 8:28:40 PM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson