But this title wasn’t a “shot” at other groups of believers, by the definition of caucus threads. I thought the rules made it clear that the fact that a particular religious belief contradicted another religion’s belief did not make it an attack on that other religion.
Certainly, there are caucus threads where specific beliefs of specific denominations are in the title, beliefs which other denominations find rediculous or even offensive. But that doesn’t make them ineligible for caucus designation, right?
For instance, if an Buddhist caucus were to post an article titled "Jesus should have packed heat" it would be inflammatory enough that the caucus protection would be removed.
Really...??? Are you really serious?
A thread titled..."J. Smith...an Apostle of Jesus Christ"...isn't a "shot" at Christians????????????
Seems clear enough to me....