Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: restornu; Jim Robinson

Open threads are fine if they Identify in the title “Anti LDS” [Resty]
- - - - - - - -
Why is that needed? The articles posted by non-mormons (so called ‘antis’ are from LDS sites, sources and authored by Mormons.

Are you claiming your own church’s writings are ‘anti’ themselves?


1,952 posted on 01/05/2011 12:00:31 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1946 | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut

Their own BOM is anti-mormon theology.

Book of Mormon

Mosiah 13:34: “Have they not said that God himself should come down among the children of men, and take upon him the form of man, and go forth in mighty power upon the face of the earth?”

Mosiah 15:1-5: “And now Abinadi said unto them: I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and shall redeem his people. And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son— The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son— And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth. And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God, suffereth temptation...”

Mosiah 16:15: “Teach them that redemption cometh through Christ the Lord, who is the very Eternal Father.”

Himself and he very eternal father.
Should BOM be sanctioned against LDS posts?


1,977 posted on 01/05/2011 12:33:51 PM PST by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson