This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 01/10/2011 1:39:34 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
. |
Posted on 01/02/2011 5:46:30 PM PST by Paragon Defender
LOL...and to think I completely MISSED that it was "11" :-)
I have removed the caucus designation from exactly two LDS threads in recent memory, both were posted by Paragon Defender. I did a search on “LDS Caucus” and he seems to be the primary poster of the vast majority of them. He seems to be spamming the forum with them. And if he and or his compatriots choose to continue violating my trust, I will either continue removing them or will suspend the LDS Caucus designation privilege altogether on FR.
I KNOW you can't possibly be saying that a Christian should just play along while people worship a false god. Just so they can hang out with theri homies.
Oh wait, that's mind reading. OK, ARE you saying that?
There you go!
Other 'answers' for 'who He was' had already been given. Jesus didn't waste His time saying WHY those answers were not right (or wrong), but used this LAST answer to show that the Holy Spirit would be the one confirming the TRUTHFULNESS of the answer to the 'question'.
All that said, how does one determine whether the Holy Spirt 'really' gave the answer or some lameo impersonator PERSONAGE did?
You should take the day off dude.
:-)
Cause it got moved?
Now the REASON for moving will have to be answered by someone other than myself.
The Bible is rightly called the Sword of the Spirit.
In the case of the subject here, it is being wielded against a false religion.
It is not being wielded against Christians, but a belief system that now (in the beginning of the LDS all Christianity was dismissed by Joseph Smith as an abomination and false) professes to be mainstream Christian, but believes in a different jesus.
God also promises in the bible that He will never, never, let His Word see corruption, and not only is this His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ, but the Holy Bible.
Mormons also hate Paul because his words condemn them. They believe in "another Jesus", one who was revealed to them by an angel of light.
NO no no no no no no no no no....
1. The CONTENTION is the LDS Articles of Faith casts DOUBT on the translation purity of the KJV bible.
2. JS backs UP this doubt by TRANSLATING (wink-wink nudge-nudge) the KJV into the JST AS ORDERED by GOD!
3. The LDS religious organization, based in Salt Lake City, USES the KJV; doubts and all.
4. The LDS religious organization, based in Salt Lake City, does NOT consider the JST to be SCRIPTURE, even though (see #2)
Clearer now?
What good does a made up claim do you? Unless you are (the real) Christ’s seed, you are dead in your sins.
I am saying, I have reached out to people myself, with the Gospel Message of Jesus Christ not by bashing thier religions and threats of them going to *Hell* but by presenting the Jesus Christ of the Holy Scriptures with
Kindness, Understanding, Compassion and truth of GOD and if they are open...As Jesus said:
Let those who have *ears to hear* and thier hear...t hears then the Holy Spirit will do the rest....
We cannot convince anyone of the Love and Salvation of Christ, only Jesus can do that...What we can do is be good Stewards of the Gospel and walk as Christ did....
Jesus did not walk the earth with a ruler in his hands slapping people in the head, threatening them with hell and damnation...
BTW, I can see why certain cults are not allowed a Caucus status, and that is a calculated thing. Once a caucus is established, the rel guidelines are not to be tampered with, and the one posting this thread was seeking to inflame which is a direct violation of the caucus rules. Could the title have been available only to those who click the thread?
Thank you, I am just wondering if there is a sensible compromise which would not cause stinkies to have a reason to stink things up like invincibly ignorant loves to do, or magritte enjoys tweaking.
This the ONLY two choices we get?
Joseph Smith: An Apostle of Jesus Christ
"..To: Ripliancum
Not at all. Just having a hard time accepting some of their threads (like this one for example) that I find extremely offensive. Im at the point that Im not going to allow any protected LDS/Mormon Caucus threads on FR. You cant post offensive stuff like this and expect Christians not to object to it. And Ill be damned if Im going to suspend or ban or deny any Christian from objecting to what he believes is the false prophecy of Joseph Smith. Whether Mormons will feel welcome here after this or not is completely up to them individually.
158 posted on Sunday, January 02, 2011 10:42:04 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!) .."
So, do Mormons still have the right to post appropriate Caucus threads?
Many are interested in a clear position.
MORMONs have a reading comprehension problem.
After reading the mormonCAUCUS elimination reply, way back when, automatically ASSUMED that EVERYTHING they hold 'precious' would be taken away from them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.