“My problem is that they insist she didnt, with absolutely NO evidence to support it.”
Your entire case revolves around one article, of one verse. Of a languate you’ve never read or heard.
The translator of that very verse, 500 years ago, argues that your interpretation is flat out wrong. Who am I going to go with? Rob Roy, or with the translator who actually has a clue about what he is talking about? I’m going to go with the translator.
>>Your entire case revolves around one article, of one verse.<<
I think you meant to post that to someone else.
I think post 124 sums it up nicely. Meanwhile, I have to move on to stuff that is relevant to me. The case has been made. It is up to the posters and lurkers to analyze the biblical evidence and decide for themselves.