[Colofornian]

NO concession at all.

I linked to the ENTIRE CONTEXT!!!!

While simultaneously excerpting...that's what an excerpt is, PD!

I do more than what YOU do, PD! I provided BOTH CONTENT as well as CONTEXT.

Wanna tell me why my linkages are deemed suspect & deceptive -- but your linkages are A-OK?

YOU on the other hand seemingly ONLY want to provide context! You just want to give links to e-haystacks & tell the reader, "Here, go find the needle."

Then when somebody complains about that, you seem to say, "Hey, I provided the context. You find the content."

I didn't pull a line out while ignoring the entire context...otherwise I wouldn't have linked to it had I wanted to even consider hoodwinking anyone!

So you continue to be in the false accusation biz?

[Paragon Defender]

I do more than what YOU do, PD! I provided BOTH CONTENT as well as CONTEXT.

---

lol... you cherry picked, misrepresented and then linked. My opinion (not a mind reading) is that you gamble that the reader won’t look at the link.. it’s easier to just rely on your reader’s digest version than to put forth any effort.

My links give the truth. I play no such games.