Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Common Atheists' Myths
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheists_myths.html ^

Posted on 12/20/2010 10:32:51 AM PST by truthfinder9

Introduction

I know that Christians are supposed to be the ones who believe a lot of myths. However, the vast majority of atheists believe myths such as religion is the primary cause of wars, and the vast amount of atrocities have been caused by religious people, the Bible has been vastly changed over the centuries, Paul invented Christianity, and the list goes on and on. Find your favorite myth below and read the article so that you won't embarrass yourself in the future.

Atheists' Myths

For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. (2 Timothy 4:3-4)

More Answers



TOPICS: Apologetics; Religion & Culture; Skeptics/Seekers; Theology
KEYWORDS: atheism; atheists; evidences; facts; proofs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-254 next last
To: circlecity; kosta50
I’ve seen that movie, it avoids Christian scripture rather than answer.

In your words, from what you've read, what is the answer?

Kosta50 and I have discussed this on many other threads, and haven't found any convincing justification for, say, 1 Samuel 15:3, where the children are ordered to be slaughtered. Almost all the time, the result is an Islam-style cop-out claiming "divine will" or something to that distortion.

81 posted on 12/20/2010 3:13:38 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
if God exists, He will either someday reveal himself to me, or, He won't.

Have you asked Him to reveal Himself and His truth? That would be a good place to start...doesn't matter if you believe now or not but what do you have to loose by going directly to the one everybody agues about? If He really is you have everything to gain...if not...well again nothing to loose.

82 posted on 12/20/2010 3:17:45 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Logic n' Reason

I too am on board with “Desiderada”.


83 posted on 12/20/2010 3:28:44 PM PST by Allen In Texas Hill Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
the Golden Rule has arisen amongst disparate cultures all over the world. It has risen because it's root is in God's word. His word does not go out void or empty but accomplishes what He sets it out to do.

In Christianity our life is IN Christ and for that our enternal security is assured. Though we are intradependant with our fellow man, our life is not dependant on mankinds advancement nor it's social structure. Rather on the relationship we have with Him as He is the giver of life and as much the one we seek concerning the decisions and paths of life we follow.

.... This often does involve our fellow man as our God loves to use people to bring about His will. But He does not need people...He can and does move in this world and among people as well without their co-operation.

Christianity serves a risen Christ...not a departed God or Gods....Our God is alive and well with many proofs that He is Lord of Lords and King over all kings as well as the earht and Heavens. He does not stoop to "other Gods" which men seek and worship...who have departed this earth and only a manmade idol of them remains.

84 posted on 12/20/2010 3:33:08 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

Atheists are aware that religious people in general have real advantages in optimism, success, health, life span, family, and happiness.
*********************************************************
There’s that piousness again. Holier than thou.

In this discussion I see/read several atheist making constructive statements of religion. Not all but some/several, me included. But from the religious you get,,,,, atheist cannot have “optimism, success, health, life span, family, and happiness”. Garbage!!! I’ll stop typing now before................


85 posted on 12/20/2010 3:40:52 PM PST by Allen In Texas Hill Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: caww

You must try and debate with Blasater1960, an Orthodox Jewish FReeper:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2642026/posts?page=84#84


86 posted on 12/20/2010 3:46:27 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: caww

This was the link that should have appeared earlier:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2637122/posts?page=21#21

Or, more generally:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:blasater1960/index?more=73519679


87 posted on 12/20/2010 3:48:54 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

GOD IS, and He is a rewarder of those who dilligently seek Him. Be sure that GOD knows whom you are and if you seek Him, He will respond to that seeking for He already knows where you are.


88 posted on 12/20/2010 3:55:19 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

And your reason for diverting this conversation? I will assume you care not to take it further...perhaps you do not have an opinion concerning Christianity.


89 posted on 12/20/2010 4:15:29 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: caww

It’s not a diversion - it’s a link that allows me to avoid repeating something over and over again. If you want help in identifying the continuation, I’d ask this: how would you refute Blasater1960’s arguments? He directly challenges what you’d replied earlier, and from following his posts here on FR, no one so far has managed to challenge him on those (one person, in fact went so far as to call him a minion of Satan, or something to that feeble and hilarious effect, to avoid making a logical case).

His arguments often go unanswered, because they do not have anything to argue with that he doesn’t shred apart, completely based on the scriptures that you speak of.


90 posted on 12/20/2010 4:24:58 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: caww
Though we are intradependant with our fellow man, our life is not dependant on mankind[']s advancement nor it's social structure.

You contradict yourself here, not to mention how wrong the statement is. Without the immediate society you're part of, you're nothing. How many solitary individuals do you know of? How many solitary families do you know of? What technologies do you use every day?

91 posted on 12/20/2010 4:29:56 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
One of the problems with the main speaker in that film is he did not ask the right questions....Just how bad and depraved were the people at that time? We are quick to forget that God had looked down on man and determined mans every thought led to evil. If one has not considered how depraved man is without God... and the absolute brutality man can do against his own as well as toward God, then He will not have an understanding of why God could take out those nations......

As for the children...God can and does take little children out of destructive situations which will harm their delicate soul..and if it means by death then that is a relief for those children for they will be immediately in his presence...but he never intended their life would be so full of such evil perpetrated by parents as well as leaders.

The world had and was becoming more and more vile as tribes and nations departed from the living God and designed their own pagan Gods...and they were teaching their children in direct opposition to God. He spared these children by taking them home to Himself. Which for a time God tolerated...just as he has in this country. But when evil escalates more and more God will take it out..and we should anticipate this is so for He is a also a God of Justice and His Judgment's are always right. Another important fact to consider is there is a battle between God and satan...in the heavenly realmns which we see eidence of being played out here on earth. Satan knows he cannot harm God as he would like...but he can hurt God by his attacks on mankind. Thus we see men become anything but good and right when they have departed from God.

92 posted on 12/20/2010 4:44:17 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
I did not say we are nothing apart from our society...you did. I said we are ‘intra’dependent...meaning we do have a choice to be a part of society or not. The point is you are implying that man can live without God...I am saying that man cannot even breath apart from God...whether He acknowleges that or not..God blesses who he will and it is not dependent on man believing..rather on the very goodness of God toward man.
93 posted on 12/20/2010 4:51:39 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: caww; kosta50
As for the children...God can and does take little children out of destructive situations which will harm their delicate soul..and if it means by death then that is a relief for those children for they will be immediately in his presence...but he never intended their life would be so full of such evil perpetrated by parents as well as leaders.

See, this right here is the problem. There's a difference between a deity taking away the lives of innocent children, and people doing it in the name of the deity, based on the orders of a "prophet". Additionally, the video mentions the part about how a child was made to suffer mercilessly for seven days (David and Bathsheba's child: 5:04 in the video above), writhing in pain, with no recourse, and ultimately dying. What was the purpose of this merciless death? To prevent it from committing sin when it grew up? Is that even an argument?!!

94 posted on 12/20/2010 4:51:55 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: caww
I said we are ‘intra’dependent...meaning we do have a choice to be a part of society or not.

Do you, really? I didn't mean just 'a society'. I meant any society. Can you truly survive without the security provided by your fellow men?

What I implied was that man cannot live without society at the level of success that he enjoys today, as a species. Wherever you are, the operating rule is that if you aren't part of a society that is benevolent towards your existence within it, you won't survive for very long, much less go on to reproduce and have a survivable population of descendants.

95 posted on 12/20/2010 4:57:23 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Allen In Texas Hill Country
But from the religious you get,,,,, atheist cannot have “optimism, success, health, life span, family, and happiness”. Garbage!!!

I didn't say atheists cannot have these things, just that the religious have competitive advantages. I'm not a religious person myself but I wish I was because the advantages are many and real. The human evolutionary purpose of religion is it provides a competitive advantage during tribal warfare. Based on archaeological evidence of religious items, the first tribe to discover religion was the tribe that wiped out all the other competing tribes and spread around the globe. In war, sports, and life in general, believing that God is on your side improves your optimism and ultimately your success. Out of envy, leftist atheists wish to spoil and destroy these religious advantages. An accusation of envy that results in an angry response is evidence of a direct hit.

96 posted on 12/20/2010 5:03:53 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
I read his post as well as those he referenced who are affiliated with...’The Messiah Truth Project’, which is a organization established to combat missionary techniques of evangelical Christian denominations and the Messianic Jews... which they state on their site.

Many of the comments he made were just that...comments..such as this or that isn't true..without giving concrete scriptures in which others could debate. Though he referenced the Torah he did not explain the contents in how he see these...rather just thru them out there...making claims this or that Rabbi stated so and so.

Since the organization from which he posted..is opposed to Christ and His Missionaries, as well as those Jews who have recognized Christ as Messiah,....it should not be surprising he argues from the organizations perspective as it would appear he adheres to their stance.

I recognize the Jewish peoples blindness to the truth has been for the benefit of all non-Jews who do see Christ as the Savior. So of course their Rabbi's will oppose the Christian faith, as they did in the beginning of Christ's mission. Just as Jesus did not spend much time arguing with the Jewish Religious Leaders then might be why posters have opted out of debating with them as well...... I'm not interested either for they are those who do just as the Religious leaders did when Christ walked among us...they are Anti-Christ...they oppose Christ in every way....which is very different than having dialogue with those who are nonbelievers.

97 posted on 12/20/2010 5:32:38 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: caww

The thing is, if the opposition had a case against his arguments, all they need to do is post verses countering what they’ve posted. I do not think it’s merely ‘opting out’ that they’re doing - they really seem to have nothing to say.

As a third-party observer, could you point out the fallacies in his arguments below, in private, if you don’t want them to be public? I really am curious.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2564632/posts?page=39#39

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2627492/posts?page=20#20

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2594582/posts?page=33#33

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2583537/posts?page=86#86

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2579986/posts?page=57#57

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2579986/posts?page=41#41

And

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2580819/posts?page=3#3

(Exhaustive, I know, but feel free to choose the key points he makes, and let me know how you would refute them.)


98 posted on 12/20/2010 6:08:23 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: caww
"... all they need to do is post verses countering what they’ve he's posted."
99 posted on 12/20/2010 6:10:37 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

It is clear you are sensitive why God allows pain..be it in the lingering death of a young child...or those maimed by war. It is indeed suffering....

Unfortunately we do live in a “fallen” world. There are people who will take life and think nothing about it. “Good” Woman may find themselves pregnant but can justify to themselves, and society, that killing their own baby is not murder...and to our astounishment society agrees with them. If our society really opposed the killing of babies it would have never been permitted let alone encouraged as it is today. And yet here we are. So how can we blame God for this? Millions are now dead because man decided it was right to murder babies...God id not determine this man did.

Sin has results...it affects everyone...the woman who has taken her own childs life has also taken all the generations of children that child might have had and thiers as well. Should God continue to let this go without Judgement? Who today can honestly say out nation is protecting children when we are killing them before they are born.

David and Bathshebas’s child was ill unto death...God uses painful experinces in our life for Good...but He is not the cause of these...no doubt David needed to know you cannot defy God without consequences. David gave God no recourse when He stepped outside the protection of God and sinned. He took a mans life..and for that lost the life of that which was dearest to him.

Fathers today who divorce their wives for other woman suffer greatly in ways they never anticiapated when it comes to their children. Events happen where a father might be protective and could not be because he no longer lives with his children...this rides the mind and heart of men who love their children.

The point is you cannot blame God....He is a just and merciful God ..the fact he tolerates us at all evidences this...but He is also a God of Judgement on that which threatens others and society as a whole...when you remove the constraints of the law and cease to punish those who are lawbreakers...you then allow eil and such to flourish...and some would blame God for that? Man is to blame and none other.


100 posted on 12/20/2010 6:27:57 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson