Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: John Leland 1789
A good Latin translation, without Catholic participation was finished around 160 A.D., and was copied, and copied, and copied, and carried along far-flung trade routes by common believers who were never connected in any way with Roman Catholicism.

Wonderful point Brother.

425 posted on 12/18/2010 12:37:23 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights

Which is why we have *zero* copies of said Latin bible?

Yet we have Greek manuscripts such as the Codex Vaticanus that are far older? Wouldn’t it make sense that we would have Latin and not Greek bibles if what you say is true?

Why didn’t St. Jerome use them then, and why would the Church undertake a translation project in the 5th century if they had access to such a document? Why didn’t they continue to print this Latin bible?


498 posted on 12/18/2010 3:00:52 PM PST by BenKenobi ("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." -Tolkein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson