Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Deo volente; blue-duncan; metmom
Mary is not merely the mother of his human nature

Yes, Mary is merely the mother of his human nature. There is nothing in Scripture that tells us Mary contributed more than that.

Once again, RCs intrude upon God's domain and insert a fallible, fallen woman into the place belonging to God alone.

Creepy.

1,362 posted on 12/20/2010 11:42:28 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1332 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg

Oh, Mary was “a fallen woman.”

In what sense?


1,363 posted on 12/20/2010 11:46:26 PM PST by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1362 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Yes, Mary is merely the mother of his human nature. There is nothing in Scripture that tells us Mary contributed more than that.

How do you divide Christ Jesus' human nature from His God nature? BTW, Mary didn't just bear Him, give birth to Him; the Bible speaks of "His mother." Even the angels say, "Take the Child and His mother" etc. Matthew 2:10-12, 13-15, 19-20. The wise men worshipped the Child, not His mother. Same here.

1,365 posted on 12/20/2010 11:49:58 PM PST by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1362 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; metmom; Judith Anne; narses; Natural Law
http://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/NESTOR.TXT

NESTORIANISM

Dates 428-800s, with remnants to today

Founder Nestorius, Bishop of Constantinople

Principal errors

Nestorius rejected the traditional doctrine of the Incarnation by implicitly denying the hypostatic union of human and divine natures in the one divine person of Jesus. This denial was characterized notably by the rejection of the title "Theotokos" ("God bearer" or "Mother of God") for the mother of Jesus. He claimed that Mary was the mother of Christ's human nature but not the mother of God and concluded that only Jesus the man suffered and died on the cross.


History

From the definitions and condemnations of the Arian heresy of the fourth century several things resulted. The divinity of Christ and the reality of his Incarnation were clearly established in the minds of the faithful. Consequently, the exaltation and veneration of Mary by the faithful became more widespread. Since Jesus was truly God and Mary was his mother, she was venerated with the title of Theotokos. This veneration was especially popular in the East.

Controversy erupted in 428 when Nestorius, the newly installed bishop of Constantinople, attacked the title "Theotokos" from the pulpit in the cathedral on Christmas day, claiming that Mary was the mother of Christ but not the mother of God. He stated that to call Mary the Mother of God implied that the divine nature was born of a woman, thus making her a goddess.

Immediately his teaching was attacked by the laity and the clergy of Constantinople. When word spread of this new doctrine, neighboring bishops condemned him outright. Chief among his critics was bishop Cyril of Alexandria who responded, "I am astonished that the question should ever have been raised as to whether the Holy Virgin should be called Mother of God, for it really amounts to asking, is her Son God or is he not?" He wrote to Nestorius condemning the heretical aspects of his doctrine and asking him to explain and defend himself. The reply betrayed even further the depth of his heresy.

Cyril sent his personal correspondence with Nestorius as well his own five-book response titled "Against Nestorius" to Pope Celestine in Rome for the pontiff's decision. The Holy Father gave a general condemnation of the teaching of Nestorius regarding Mary's divine maternity and commanded him to recant within ten days. Cyril was to receive the recantation or depose Nestorius. Far from submitting, Nestorius demanded an ecumenical council and proclaimed his beliefs more loudly than ever...

While claiming to believe in one Christ in two natures, his explanation described the union of two distinct persons: "He who was formed in the womb of Mary was not God himself, but God assumed him. Through him that bears I worship him who is born." A mother cannot bear a son older than herself, he contended. Therefore, Mary did not give birth to the incarnate Word of God, only to Jesus, the temple or vessel of God. Rejecting the orthodox sense of Theotokos, he opted instead for "Christokos" ("Mother of Christ"), saying that he could never bring himself to call the Christ-child God. Nestorius concluded that it was not God who suffered and died on the cross, but only the man Jesus...

Today most Protestant denominations display an element of Nestorianism. Protestants typically reject the title "Mother of God" while echoing Nestorius' contention that a son cannot be older than his mother. They find it difficult to say that God was born in Bethlehem, that God suffered and died on the cross at Calvary. Many Protestant theologians, on the other hand, recognize this element of Nestorianism and assent to the title "Mother of God," though they use it only infrequently.
1,369 posted on 12/21/2010 12:21:06 AM PST by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1362 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson