[WrightWings]

I wasn’t “reading your mind.”

I was agreeing with you.

You couldn't have possibly agreed with me because I made no statement that I did, or did not, believe that people's minds could be changed.

My statement to you thus stands.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

You couldn't have possibly agreed with me because I made no statement that I did, or did not, believe that people's minds could be changed.

Wow. Thank God for the evidence of the written word...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2644059/posts?page=1070#1070

To: Natural Law

NL: "Do you seriously believe that the rules apply and are applied equally to all?"

WRIGHTWINGS: As much as I believe that anybody on these threads is going to be able to change anyone's mind.

1,070 posted on Sunday, December 19, 2010 10:19:25 PM by WrightWings

Thus we're left with one of two possible meanings to your post since you drew parity between Natural Law's comment and your own...

1) You seriously believe the rules DO apply and ARE applied equally to all, and therefore you DO believe peoples' minds on these threads CAN be changed.

2) You seriously do NOT believe the rules apply NOR are applied equally to all, and therefore you do NOT believe peoples' minds on these threads can be changed.

Which is it?