Posted on 12/17/2010 7:31:07 AM PST by marshmallow
Shirley you jest...The authors of the NT scriptures were the leaders...There was no Catholic church...
And there were no writings of the Apostles/Disciples that were saved by the Catholic church...How could you even repeat such a lie???
THERE WERE NO OTHER CHRISTIANS AROUND in early church history.....the Catholic were the only ones and no one can refute that.
The bible refutes that...
“But mostly, it is annoying to everyone.”
______________________________________________________________
I never thought you would say that. You’ve restored my faith in religion moderators! Thank you.
“The bible refutes that... “
Snort. Guffaw.
ROTFLMAO!
Quix, I enjoy your posts and seems like competition to be like you is underway.
OH DEAR ME!
One of me in the galactic cluster is probably quite enough!
LOL.
However, never fear . . . God did a very extra unique thing with me . . . and 100’s of people have insisted for almost 64 years that He then threw away the mold.
I should, however, thank copiers for the flattery inherent therein.
Usually, they give up in frustration after a time.
Rev. 12:1 - Mary, the “woman,” is crowned with twelve stars. She is Queen of heaven and earth and the Mother of the Church.
John, the author of Rev, took care of Mary, why did he not write her name directly into Rev 12:1?
I believe all the Early Church Fathers said the women crowned with 12 stars was Israel. The women in rev also suffered labor pains, which was part of the curse on Eve (oops).
THANKS FOR YOUR KIND WORDS, BTW.
I see now, that my repetitions are begged to be deleted.
Obviously some spam is more equal than others. LOL.
LOL, and your claim to scholarship is?
No trouble forgiving at all.
I confess, I considered it all a game beginning to end.
Sorry for the bother in your busy-ness.
It’s really not cool to post in Latin on this forum.
BTW presently no screen name I think he is trying to perform and exorcism on you.
That's just an opinion.
I am absolutely open to quix no longer playing his multi-colored, repetitive posts which would eliminate my responses to same.
Nobody is forcing you to read his posts or respond to them.
But your response to them with your own repetitive posts is doing the very thing you are condemning in him. Does that not then make your posts abusive as well?
“That’s just an opinion.”
Yep, and the RM’s opinion is that it is abusive spam. Ask him if you are unable to puzzle that out of the posts here.
Contrary to some RC’s,
I’m happy to support the RM by quick and genuine compliance with his requests, instructions, orders.
I’m usually pretty good at complying with the letter of RM’s law and I try to comply with the spirit thereof, at least in most cases that I wrap my understanding around accordingly.
However, I suspect you’ll be quite disappointed.
While living within the RM’s boundaries, there’s a fair certainty that I’ll still be Quix.
You may continue to gnash your teeth on that truth.
“...you don’t get to call the shots here. “
Neither do you.
Yeah . . .
!!!!CONTROL!!!! is one of the main
Vatican Alice In Wonderland School of Theology and Reality Mangling
dogmas
. . . as well as a hallowed
Station of
The Stations of the White Hankys.
That would balance out the post body count, wouldn't it?
I think I can avoid repeating things in the same thread within 100 posts and probably within the same 12-24 hours.
I hope that meets the RM’s expectations?
If not, perhaps the RM could state more precise guidelines.
**While living within the RM’s boundaries, there’s a fair certainty that I’ll still be Quix.**
So you know who the RM is and you live in his house (boundaries)?????????????
NOT!
Now I see wny things happen the way they do around here! LOL!
Well, which is it? Are you laughing at them or taking them personally?
Judging by your responses here, it's not laughing very much....
That’ll work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.