Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54

>>Just for clarification, why do you believe the Hebrew phrase in Isaiah 17:1 is properly interpreted the way you require?<<

First let’s get something straight. I don’t require anything. It’s my interpretation that Isaiah is saying that Damascus “is taken away from being a city” would indicate that it would no longer be a city after that.


133 posted on 12/12/2010 2:33:58 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear
First let’s get something straight. I don’t require anything. It’s my interpretation that Isaiah is saying that Damascus “is taken away from being a city” would indicate that it would no longer be a city after that.

Yes, but what it it about the Hebrew that leads you to that conclusion?

134 posted on 12/12/2010 2:41:57 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- like crack for the eschatologically naive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson