To: lastchance; Dr. Eckleburg
We take it to mean that human agency had a part in the writing of the Scripture. That St. Paul did not lack free will while under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. I admit she phrased it badly but it was not to show that St. Pauls writings are not inspired.This makes absolutely no sense ... So Paul had the "free will" ability to write things contrary to the things that came to his mind under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit?? How would one call that infallible or innerent or even inspired??
1,211 posted on
12/07/2010 3:52:58 PM PST by
RnMomof7
(Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
To: RnMomof7
Why do you assume that having free will means St. Paul would write something other than what God willed him to write. The object of free will is not to oppose God’s will but to perfectly unite with it through and by grace.
To: RnMomof7
This makes absolutely no sense ... So Paul had the "free will" ability to write things contrary to the things that came to his mind under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit?? How would one call that infallible or innerent or even inspired?? lol. The frantic web of self-deceit.
1,217 posted on
12/07/2010 4:09:31 PM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson