Posted on 12/05/2010 6:14:57 PM PST by RnMomof7
But, maybe it's just a Freudian slip, given the posting history of the FReeper in question, which is that of being a vocal evo, to the point of going over to that other site to plot strategy. As a result, I'd imagine it' was intended to be "yom."
They just love that one over there, think it's the way to slide evolution into Genesis. Never mind how the days of Creation were described, that clearly reinforce the literal interpretation, with the evening and the morning counted out with each successive day.
This is worse than the "CREVO" threads!
Actually, it’s not per se
PERSONS whom I disagree with
that per se trigger such images.
IT IS GROSS ABSURDITIES,
OUTRAGEOUS DUPLICITIES,
and otherwise horrific assertions that I’d just as soon not get embroiled in
in that post.
THEREFORE, an image fits the bill much better.
Sometimes, it’s because I think I’ve pontificated enough and prefer to just post pics.
That would certainly be an improvement, no doubt about it.
Years ago, I thought the Religion Forum might be a great place to hang out, here on FR. What a joke! The RF is the sewer of the site.
And yet you're here.....
Now
THAT’S
blasphemy
[joke]
>>What’s *nom* supposed to mean?<<
ARGH!!! Why did God give me such huge fingers to hit the wrong keys????
I meant “Yom!”
I wonder if this is like Snoopy when he yawned and let Lucy’s balloon go - he had to hit the road.
Please forgive me — and I am pretty sure you understand the “Yom” reference. Interestingly, “Nom” does mean something — “war” or “warlike” or “pertaining to war.”
How’s that for irony?
:)
From my understanding, Mary was not charged with original sine because God new that Christ needed a mother. (According to Roman Catholic doctrine.)
If Mary had carried the guilt of “original sin”, then Christ would not have been sinless. If Christ carried original sin as a stain on his soul, he could never have been the perfect sacrifice that atoned for all of our sins.
Other christian faiths have often failed to provide a reasoned explanation of how Christ could be sinless when born of a human mother.
Does my pedestrian expression of the crux of the matter suffice? LOL
I find the drug gangs demonstrations of love and respect for Santa Muerte particularly touching. Don't you?
TOUCHE to the max.
Lots of things have their . . . wellll anyway.
I find it so funny how it’s the Catholics who want to control you, what you post, the pictures, your fonts, what you say. LOL!!
Control is manipulation which is witchcraft from the pit.
BTW - I’m an engineering-biased protestant (or “prostetant: as my original dogtag said) with a (Roman) Catholic wife and kids. LOL
But half the world?????
REALLY?????
Jeeze it is so steeply versed in lore it is hard to come up with "sources."
Go to Mexico City and see the Manta itself within the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe and go up onto the spot where Juan Diego was given the roses (impossible to get that time of year) and the Manta itself.
As I said, the RCC has beatified (correct spelling this time I hope) and thus has accepted the event as Canon.
The same is true for the appearances of Mary as Our Lady of Fatima, Lourdes and others. She appears historically in very definable places when needed most.
If I was her I wouldn't wast my time appearing today. People are too cynical and detached from God.
Yeah,... I was suspecting that.
S(n)ide references are never pretty. God created Evolution as the way to create Man and so much more.
But beyond that I sayeth no more on this thread.
... and if Mary's mother had carried the guilt of Original Sin, then Mary would not have been sinless. And if Mary's grandmother had carried the guilt of Original sin, then Mary's mother would not have been sinless.
You'd have to carry this line of reasoning all the way back to a sinless Eve, and we well know Eve was not sinless.
So, we accept scripture, that Jesus Christ was born of a virgin, Mary, who was herself in need of salvation, according to her own words.
Jesus Christ was sinless. Mary was not. Was she favored and even blessed? Yes, scripture tells us this. But it also tells us she was not sinless.
I do not understand the purpose of adding this Mariology as a result. It's not necessary to salvation and it's not supported by scripture.
That's why you see so many rebuking the belief on the FR Religion Forum.
I find it so funny how it’s the Catholics who want to control you, what you post, the pictures, your fonts, what you say. LOL!!
Control is manipulation which is witchcraft from the pit.
INDEED. Well put.
However, !!!!CONTROL!!!! is not a new theme in such exchanges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.