I rejected the argument for multiple reasons. First is that it wasn't cogent. Second was that I do not accept the premise and am not willing to accept it even for rhetorical purpose. Third is that the conclusion is nothing more than an a priori supposition.
Your prose is overly verbose, the meter is more reminiscent of Dr. Seus than Scripture making your works look silly instead of inspired. And lastly, buy a vowel. Your manipulation of the English language as some kind of Old Testament loop hole is demeaning and ridiculous.
I rejected the argument for multiple reasons. First is that it wasn't cogent. Second was that I do not accept the premise and am not willing to accept it even for rhetorical purpose. Third is that the conclusion is nothing more than an a priori supposition.
Your prose is overly verbose, the meter is more reminiscent of Dr. Seus than Scripture making your works look silly instead of inspired. And lastly, buy a vowel. Your manipulation of the English language as some kind of Old Testament loop hole is demeaning and ridiculous.
If you do not accept the premise of Aristotelian discourse, Enjoy the wide road of life and all that it entails. Clearly you reject the One True G-d: YHvH Seek the face of YHvH in His Holy Word. Thank you for your considered comments and compliments.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
clearly we can not discuss even the daily weather.
of the Holy Scriptures and embrace
some other gospel and some other god.