Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o; Kolokotronis
I'm not convinced that anyone within Orthodoxy has or had the authority to make this change on a moral theology issue that has been constant and universal since the early Christians, based on Scripture. Calling it nothing more than "disciplinary" doesn't make it so. We're not talking about changing a church discipline like not eating meat on Fridays, or even the discipline of a married vs celibate clergy.

Another word for a "new consensus" on settled moral theology issues might just be apostasy.

80 posted on 11/30/2010 12:44:32 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM (Liberalism is infecund.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Brian Kopp; Mrs. Don-o; FormerLib

“I’m not convinced that anyone within Orthodoxy has or had the authority to make this change on a moral theology issue that has been constant and universal since the early Christians, based on Scripture.”

No one person does, Doc. The Laos tou Theou certainly does, though. if Rome had a similar praxis, you wouldn’t have a dogma about artificial birth control either.

“Calling it nothing more than “disciplinary” doesn’t make it so.”

For us it does. Remember, we’re not Roman Catholics.

“We’re not talking about changing a church discipline like not eating meat on Fridays, or even the discipline of a married vs celibate clergy.”

Why not? For us, this issue is at best disciplinary.


84 posted on 11/30/2010 2:16:36 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson