Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Normandy

You are practicing a form of deceit, Norm. Do you really want to tell us that quoting your founding ‘prophet’, JOseph Smith, is only quoting ‘early officials’ and thus you place yourself in a position of denying the very teaching of your ‘prophet’? If all you can do is play deceitful misdirection, it might be more moral for you to just remain mute int he face of such overwhelming proof of the deceitfulness of your religion and the anti-Christian teachings of your founders.


138 posted on 12/02/2010 1:55:28 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

I’m just explaining that Jesus being married isn’t an official doctrine of the LDS church. This issue came up a few years ago when the Da Vinci Code was published.

Dale Bills, a spokesman for the church said, “The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine. It is neither sanctioned nor taught by the church. While it is true that a few church leaders in the mid-1800s expressed their opinions on the matter, it was not then, and is not now, church doctrine.”

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/635208214/LDS-do-not-endorse-claims-in-Da-Vinci.html


139 posted on 12/02/2010 2:03:40 PM PST by Normandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson