Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: caww
Instead you hear something, categorize it according to the template you have before you, and choose whichever talking point most closely approximates an item on the menu of your template. It is like talking not to a man but to a machine.

Good. Here's the template: I read the post. I select things that are incorrect in it. I look at the relevant scripture and next I look at the relevant context. I can understand both because I know Catholic theology well enough, having received thourough Religion Forum training (I have a FR diploma on my wall). I then present the scripture to the reader and explain it.

My 6676 is an example of that method. You made an assertion about a particular part of the scripture and decided to apply it to the entire scripture. I then looked at verses that contradict your generalization and cited them to you.

If you expect some different style of communication, you probably will not get it from me.

7,049 posted on 01/14/2011 5:34:00 AM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6689 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
If you expect some different style of communication, you probably will not get it from me.

You had to go pretty far back to find a post from me. But you have ignored my 'recent posts' not to ping me. This will now be the 'third time' I will say: Please do not ping me to your posts nor go searching for something back on the threads in which you may feel justified in doing so. Otherwise my next move will be to contact the moderator.

7,051 posted on 01/14/2011 9:24:16 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7049 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson