Thanks for the reply and, yes, I'm still up. I'm the kind of person who just believes that there is an intelligent God that created us. That this intelligent creator created man with intelligence as well. I also believe that he didn't just create this intelligent creature and take off but desired to communicate with this creation. That he did this in a way that was verifiable - he told certain people things they did not know and those things happened exactly as he said they would. He also performed miraculous deeds - things that were outside of what was normally observed - in order to demonstrate his power over the natural world.
Now, granted those things happened a long time ago, yet the record of it has persisted, which tells me that it is this intelligent creator who sees to it that this information has been preserved. I believe that the Bible is that record. It is also still relevant and timely and the wisdom contained in it is just as true today as when it was first revealed.
Now, to the subject of God's "emotions" as we call them. Obviously, they are not the same as human emotions, but perfect intrinsically. In the KJV the word "hate" is used less than 100 times. And there are really only a few that speak about God's expression of it. Most of the time it speaks of others who hate wrongly. A few times it is hate towards others who hate God and his ways. When I looked at the examples where the word is used about God, I see that, predominately, it is his expression of aversion to behaviors rather than to a creation. If you look at that great verse in Proverbs 6:16 where God is said to hate/detest and find "abominable" seven things. They are all negative behaviors. They are: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
Every one of those behaviors are called evil and they result in evil outcomes. God hates all evil. He hates wickedness. We are told in Proverbs 8:13 "The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogance, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.". So we are commanded to also hate and detest those same evil behaviors. We are told repeatedly to hate evil and love good which is what God also does. Since he alone is omniscient, only he can hate perfectly.
It is really not just how you happen to interpret the Bible, it is overwhelmingly present throughout Scripture that God does hate, yet, it is NOT directly a person but the person's actions. It is those actions - and we all are guilty of one or more of those top seven - that separate us from God. Sin is what it is called and sin has a penalty associated with it. God is holy, righteous, and loves justice. His holiness will not even look upon sin. His righteousness will not allow sin in his presence. His justice demands penalty for sin. He says the only penalty his justice will accept is death.
But this is not the only side of God. He is also merciful, slow to anger and abounding in love. In fact, he loved us so much that he took on flesh as a man and paid the sin debt penalty in our place that his justice demanded. You had said before that it seemed unjust that an innocent person would be sacrificed for the guilty and I agreed. But it wasn't just an innocent man - because no man is innocent, all have sinned and fall short of God's perfection. It was God himself who bore our sins and paid the penalty in his own blood. That is the amazingly awesome grace of God. He offers this redemption as a gift and we, by faith, receive it. There aren't two different Gods, one Old Testament and a different one in the New. It's the same one, the only one, and we see that he has not changed at all. I accept him as he says he is, not what I pretend he is and he is pretty wonderful.
I am not going to argue with your beliefs, boatbums. You stated what you believe and that's where it ends. You believe literally what is in the Bible, at least your version and translation of it and that is certainly your prerogative.
But then you move past that and try to attach logic to this a priori belief. And that's when things become contentious. I will mention only one example. You write
Now, granted those things happened a long time ago, yet the record of it has persisted, which tells me that it is this intelligent creator who sees to it that this information has been preserved
If that is your "proof" then consider that the Hindu scriptures, which are the oldest holy books in the world, were preserved for much longer than yours. Are you ready to admit, then, that Brahman is the true God?
Because He is love. It is not complicated.