Point well taken. Obviosuly I was thinking of a different verse.
More tales from the apocrypha and “since he could do anything he did this and such because he could”.
Whether they are tales form "apocrypha" or not is not the point. The point is that is what the Church teaches. You can take it or leave it.
The reason for the belief has to do with the supernatural nature of Incarnation and Resurrection as such.
I believe the poster was attempting to draw some connection between John 20:19 and the manner of Jesus birth when there is none.
Why would that be attempted? I must assume because of a tale even the Catholic Church recognizes as spurious is accepted as fact by the poster.
“The reason for the belief has to do with the supernatural nature of Incarnation and Resurrection as such”
Sounds more like getting lost in the jungles of speculative analogies and never finding the way out.