Thankfully, Isaac Newton predicted Israel would be made a Nation again...but they’ll never match Newton for Biblical understanding."
And Newton wrote papers assailing the Council of Nicaea and denying the Trinity and the existence of Satan. So it appears that your Spriritual Genius blasphemes the Holy Spirit. (Mark 3:29)
Furthermore, while he predicted a return to Israel, he dated the Apocalypse at 2060 AD so you and your fellow Dysfunctionalists will likely be quite dead before our LORD returns so your claims that the latest troop movement or earthquake is a sure sign of our LORD's return are just as bogus. Granted, you aren't the only Dysfunctionalist who has name-dropped Newton and talked up his credentials, there are other characters who have tied in the 1948 date and Newton's numbers (using new math, apparently) and Sabbaths-till-Jubilee reckoning to perform yet another common stunt of the Dysfunctionalists: date setting. In this case the heroes of your cult have set a 2003-2004 return date of our LORD. Since you folks never admit error, we must surely be six years into the Great Tribulation and you have been "Left Behind".
Despite that gaff, you should also then surrender your Premillennial Dysfunctionalism and adopt his Preterist position since he, as a Historicist, has taken all of your Daniel, Ezekiel and Revelation prophecies that you swear are still future, and he shows in good detail their fulfillment well over a thousand years ago. But I do understand why you would pick and choose your teachings, because Dispies also suffer from acute Spiritual Alzheimer's, zealously quoting one passage as Truth, then minutes later conveniently forgetting that passage, and how it contradicts the other passage you claim as Truth.
I would also like to address the "there must be a nation of Israel" claim. Personally, I think it is a self-fulfilling prophecy since Zionists have been working a restoration of a political Israel for centuries. Clearly you either have never been taught, or simply have denied out of hand all of the doctrines regarding "The Land" and its relevance to the Covenants. I know you deny the teachings of Covenants else you wouldn't be screaming "Replacementarians" every time you argue yourself into a corner.
What is clear is that you believe that God is a failure and is not control of His Creation, why else would you give credit to the United Nations for the formation of Israel? Throughout Biblical history, God has raised up leaders and formed nations from their military conquests. In Genesis, when God promised to Abraham the land, God also told Abraham that the original inhabitants did not yet earn their expulsion from the Land, and as God is just, He gave the original inhabitants the time needed to merit their expulsion. That is part of the reason for the sojourn in Egypt and the desert. When Joshua entered in to the Promised Land, God marched before him to clear out their enemies.
Joshua 21:43"So the Lord gave to Israel all the land of which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they took possession of it and dwelt in it."
Despite your group's denials, the Scriptures plainly state that the Land Promise was fulfilled in Joshua's time. So any new Land for a political Israel is not in the Convenants, but is contained in your perversion of God's doctrines of Redemption, and the resulting eschatological heresies that deny the Promise God made to Abraham.
Can you honestly state that the 1948 Israel has any relation whatsoever to the mode and manner God fulfilled the land promise through Joshua? The formation of a political Israel was made by decree from a band of Gentile Reprobates, not by God leading one of his servants into battle. So who gets the Glory for a "restored Israel"? That's right, to the delight of the Dysfunctionalists, God gets zero glory. That is probably why Israel doesn't occupy even a significant fraction of the Original Promised Land, and appears highly unlikely to ever do so - because only God can set national boundaries. (Acts 17:26).
I personally don’t know of a single Dispy who thinks that Revelation was written in 95 AD or after the fall of Jerusalem.
Oh my. I'm going to pretend that you didn't actually post that. The Full Preterists probably won't though.
About what I expected from you.
I gather that the only theologian you think is flawless is the one in your mirror.
It appears that we don’t have a sufficiently shared vocabulary to have a meaningful discussion.
Enjoy your fantasies as long as ‘reality’ allows them.
I find them horrifically convoluted and UNBiblical as well as UNHistorical.