Does that mean that to the Reformed, it doesn't matter if a statement is a blatant and outrageous lie, as long as it conforms to the belief of the elect, that it should be considered true? Sounds like the Reformed version of Borking. Perhaps Kosta, you should feel honoured since you have now joined the ranks of such as Robert Bork attempting to face a hostile Democratic committee opposing his Supreme Court nomination with a barrage of lies, damned lies and innuendo. Something of what they tried to do to Clarence Thomas, as well.
I am immensely flattered when I am assailed by them. :)