To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl; OldNavyVet; allmendream; Diamond; xzins; marron; Quix; r9etb; TXnMA; ...
Sounds like a daffynitionary is in play again . . . UNUSUAL . . . by personal arbitrary daffynition = random
because the individual is not interested in contemplating the implications, otherwise.
It seems to me that it is
MORE logical to presume that UNUSUAL
indicates some UNUSUAL origins of the UNUSUAL events observed.
DOH!
59 posted on
10/31/2010 4:55:34 PM PDT by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Quix; betty boop
Indeed. And ironically, many of those who believe Christians cutoff scientific inquiry by declaring "God did it" do that very thing by saying in so many words (e.g. random instead of unpredictable) that "Nature did it."
To: Quix; Alamo-Girl
GREAT observation, dear brother in Christ!
82 posted on
11/01/2010 11:45:34 AM PDT by
betty boop
(Seek truth and beauty together; you will never find them apart. — F. M. Cornford)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson