Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; Dr. Brian Kopp
Ah, so despite the protestations otherwise, there ARE those here arguing that what 75% of Americans do in their bedrooms should be illegal and is compatible with a Government of limited and enumerated powers.

There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between arguing that something should be illegal and simply acknowledging that government has the authority to make it illegal if it so desires.

I wonder which enumerated power would cover such Government regulation. Interstate commerce again? The Liberals favorite excuse for unlimited government power!

Libertarians LOVE to bring up the Commerce Clause. Why don't you tell us, what DOES the Commerce Clause cover?

And let's take the federal government out of it, ALL of the states had morality laws at the time the Constitution was ratified (homosexuality was a capital offense in some states), NOBODY suggested that the states didn't have the authority. Do you believe that the states still have the authority?

99 posted on 10/25/2010 12:07:02 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
Both arguments seem to be advanced.

That the government HAS the authority (at either the State or Federal level), and that the decisions striking down laws against birth control were poorly decided (and thus, using logic, that they should still be illegal).

What does the Commerce Clause cover? The regulation of Interstate commerce, not the regulation of every act or non-action that could conceivable have any influence at all upon interstate commerce. Notice the difference?

I don't believe the State has any authority to abridge amend or fail to recognize the natural rights of man. That which is forbidden to the Federal Government in recognition of our natural rights, is similarly forbidden to the State Government.

Do you think a State law could abridge your freedom of speech? Keep in mind that the 1st Amendment says “Congress shall make no law....”. Do you think that a State law abridging your freedom of speech would be compatible with a Government of limited and enumerated powers that recognizes the natural rights of man?

103 posted on 10/25/2010 12:14:11 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson