The following terms come to mind:
Military intelligence.
Just as Communism was actually projection of Russian (and Chinese) power, so modern Islam is actually a projection of Saudi (and Iranian) power. Making this a First Amendment question is just as misguided as thinking the Cold War had anything to do with economics. The stated goals are a distraction from enemy action.
It would be best not to nuke Mecca or Medina, but use MOABs on the palaces of Riyadh and Tehran. Stop the flow of money to madrassas and terror cells worldwide, stop the threat from Islam.
Oh my, by your direction, I know just what to see here, and how you feel about it, mrreaganaut. I so share your concerns!
Hopefully no MOABS nor nukes will be imposed. [I do not forget the problem of innocent civilian casualties in any targeted area.] Perhaps this possible eventuality can be most surely avoided by folks just simply following your advice:
Stop the flow of money to madrassas and terror cells worldwide, stop the threat from Islam.It's the start of some new thing.... Thus — perhaps — the future of Plaza 51/Cordoba Mosque is already dead in the present moment, in a certain way.
Now to realize that thought... to understand it.
JMHO, FWIW.
Thank you ever so much for writing, mrreaganaut!