What in my statement warrants my “re-reading” the article?
To be a Scout, you dont have to declare a religion, just not be an atheist.
What the family did is irrelevant to that point.
The context of this thread has even addressed kids as scouts or cubs. It wasn't part of the story; nor part of my comments.
It was purely about a church's right to screen leadership amongst the adults. That's it.
The comment of yours that warrants re-reading was your comment at the end about a laser.