Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54
But you didn’t present any convincing argument as to how Peter “scoffer” language applies here. I’m sure you have something in mind based on a futurist reading of Scripture. There's nothing about "creation days" or Methuselah in the passage. That's your pap. You are assuming stuff that is not there.

Usually when one intends to 'study' a passage they at least need to start at the 'beginning'... Now for the unlearned that would be Genesis 1:1... and Peter certainly discloses that is where he begins his instruction....

27 posted on 10/21/2010 4:16:12 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
Usually when one intends to 'study' a passage they at least need to start at the 'beginning'...

That sounds like an excuse for not dealing with text at hand. You can spend all day obfuscating the text by running willy-nilly around the Bible without making a point.

28 posted on 10/21/2010 7:43:00 AM PDT by topcat54 ("Don't whine to me. It's all Darby's fault.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson