Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ontap
Since according to the story he was fully covered by insurance he only lost the personal items that can’t be replaced so should require little help!

Making sure the FD wouldn't put out the fire so that he could collect the full amount on the house , because he refused to pay the bill, is just a coincidence.

65 posted on 10/07/2010 8:37:02 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

If you are implying he made the conscientious decision not to cover his house so he could torch it that’s a possibility I would not deny...of course proving it would be next to impossible!


74 posted on 10/07/2010 8:44:44 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2

If the fire department had no permission to enter the property because the home owner paid no fee, could they have been sued for trespassing?


141 posted on 10/07/2010 10:33:02 AM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson